Flashback Episode — The Choice: John 13:1-30


Read the Transcript

As John’s gospel shifts to looking at the night Jesus was betrayed and arrested, John shares some amazing details included in a special meal Jesus shares with His followers. This meal was the Passover meal, and from this point forward in history, this meal has been called the Last Supper.

However, during this meal, John draws our attention onto several powerful ideas, the first of which is found in the first few verses of our passage. With that said, let’s begin reading our passage for this episode.

Our passage is found in John’s gospel, chapter 13, and we will read it from the New Century Version of the Bible. Starting in verse 1, John tells us that:

It was almost time for the Passover Feast. Jesus knew that it was time for him to leave this world and go back to the Father. He had always loved those who were his own in the world, and he loved them all the way to the end.

Jesus and his followers were at the evening meal. The devil had already persuaded Judas Iscariot, the son of Simon, to turn against Jesus. Jesus knew that the Father had given him power over everything and that he had come from God and was going back to God. So during the meal Jesus stood up and took off his outer clothing. Taking a towel, he wrapped it around his waist. Then he poured water into a bowl and began to wash the followers’ feet, drying them with the towel that was wrapped around him.

While most of those who have been Christians for any significant length of time know what happens next, I want to pause here to draw out two huge truths that are found in these first few verses of our passage.

The first truth is that Jesus intentionally loved the people God sent Him into the world to love, and Jesus intentionally loved them all the way to the end. In other words, Jesus faced the cross because He loves you, me, and all of those who God wants to redeem for eternity!

Following sharing about Jesus’ love, John then tells us in verse 3 that at this meal: “Jesus knew that the Father had given him power over everything and that he had come from God and was going back to God.

Everything that happens in Jesus’ life and ministry following this point is 100% within Jesus’ control, and that means clearly that Jesus chose the cross. God the Father did not force Jesus onto the cross. Jesus chose the cross willingly.

Immediately after sharing that Jesus had been given power over everything, the first thing Jesus does is step into the lowest role in that society and move around the room washing the disciples’ feet. While the next part of our passage focuses on Jesus washing Peter’s feet, it is also amazing to realize that, since this was early on in the evening, Jesus would have washed Judas Iscariot’s feet as well.

Let’s continue reading. As Jesus was washing each of His disciples’ feet, in verse 6 we read:

Jesus came to Simon Peter, who said to him, “Lord, are you going to wash my feet?”

Jesus answered, “You don’t understand now what I am doing, but you will understand later.”

Peter said, “No, you will never wash my feet.”

Jesus answered, “If I don’t wash your feet, you are not one of my people.”

Simon Peter answered, “Lord, then wash not only my feet, but wash my hands and my head, too!”

10 Jesus said, “After a person has had a bath, his whole body is clean. He needs only to wash his feet. And you men are clean, but not all of you.” 11 Jesus knew who would turn against him, and that is why he said, “Not all of you are clean.”

12 When he had finished washing their feet, he put on his clothes and sat down again. He asked, “Do you understand what I have just done for you? 13 You call me ‘Teacher’ and ‘Lord,’ and you are right, because that is what I am. 14 If I, your Lord and Teacher, have washed your feet, you also should wash each other’s feet. 15 I did this as an example so that you should do as I have done for you. 16 I tell you the truth, a servant is not greater than his master. A messenger is not greater than the one who sent him. 17 If you know these things, you will be blessed if you do them.

18 “I am not talking about all of you. I know those I have chosen. But this is to bring about what the Scripture said: ‘The man who ate at my table has turned against me.’ 19 I am telling you this now before it happens so that when it happens, you will believe that I am he. 20 I tell you the truth, whoever accepts anyone I send also accepts me. And whoever accepts me also accepts the One who sent me.”

21 After Jesus said this, he was very troubled. He said openly, “I tell you the truth, one of you will turn against me.”

22 The followers all looked at each other, because they did not know whom Jesus was talking about. 23 One of the followers sitting next to Jesus was the follower Jesus loved. 24 Simon Peter motioned to him to ask Jesus whom he was talking about.

25 That follower leaned closer to Jesus and asked, “Lord, who is it?”

26 Jesus answered, “I will dip this bread into the dish. The man I give it to is the man who will turn against me.” So Jesus took a piece of bread, dipped it, and gave it to Judas Iscariot, the son of Simon. 27 As soon as Judas took the bread, Satan entered him. Jesus said to him, “The thing that you will do—do it quickly.” 28 No one at the table understood why Jesus said this to Judas. 29 Since he was the one who kept the money box, some of the followers thought Jesus was telling him to buy what was needed for the feast or to give something to the poor.

30 Judas took the bread Jesus gave him and immediately went out. It was night.

In this passage, I was tempted to stop several times, but I resisted, because I wanted to help draw our attention onto the entire context of Jesus’ message. All too often, when reading or hearing this passage, we only hear a small section and not the whole passage in context.

While John’s gospel doesn’t focus in on Jesus sharing the wine or the bread and the symbolism that Jesus gives to each, John’s gospel does focus on the teaching Jesus shares, and on the detail that Jesus fully knew who would betray Him.

This passage contains a bunch of powerful spiritual truths and ideas, and unfortunately there isn’t enough time left to cover them all.

However, one big truth worth paying attention to is that nothing about that night caught Jesus by surprise and Jesus was more aware of everything that would happen than even Judas Iscariot was.

This idea becomes the foundation for the biggest truth this passage emphasized, and this truth is simply that Jesus willingly chose the cross, and that He chose it because He loves you and He loves me!

As we come to the end of another podcast episode, here are the challenges I will leave you with:

As I always challenge you to do, continue to seek God first in your life and choose to accept Jesus’ gift of His sacrifice on our behalf. Jesus chose the cross for you and for me. Let’s not take Jesus’ sacrifice for granted or belittle it through the way we live or act.

Also, continue to pray and study the Bible for yourself in order to grow closer to Jesus each and every day. As we grow closer to Jesus through prayer and study, discover how much Jesus loves you personally, and how much Jesus was willing to face so that you could be forgiven of your sin! Jesus faced death for you and me, and this is something that was entirely His choice!

And as I end every set of challenges by saying in one way or another, never stop short of, back away from, chicken out of, or abandon where God wants to lead you to in your life with Him!

Flashback Episode: Year in John – Episode 32: As John shares about special supper Jesus had with His disciples on the night He was betrayed and arrested, discover in the details how this event frames Jesus’ personal choice to face the cross, and how His choice opens up the way for our choice about whether we will choose God or not!

Responding with Apathy: Matthew 27:1-10

Focus Passage: Matthew 27:1-10 (GW)

Early in the morning all the chief priests and the leaders of the people decided to execute Jesus. They tied him up, led him away, and handed him over to Pilate, the governor.

Then Judas, who had betrayed Jesus, regretted what had happened when he saw that Jesus was condemned. He brought the 30 silver coins back to the chief priests and leaders. He said, “I’ve sinned by betraying an innocent man.”

They replied, “What do we care? That’s your problem.”

So he threw the money into the temple, went away, and hanged himself.

The chief priests took the money and said, “It’s not right to put it into the temple treasury, because it’s blood money.” So they decided to use it to buy a potter’s field for the burial of strangers. That’s why that field has been called the Field of Blood ever since. Then what the prophet Jeremiah had said came true, “They took the 30 silver coins, the price the people of Israel had placed on him, 10 and used the coins to buy a potter’s field, as the Lord had directed me.”

Read Matthew 27:1-10 in context and/or in other translations on BibleGateway.com!

When reading in Matthew’s gospel about the fate of Judas Iscariot, I am startled by what actually happens. Only Matthew includes the fate of Jesus’ betrayer and in what Matthew tells us is a brief, but also amazing, conversation between Judas Iscariot and the chief priests and religious leaders.

Matthew transitions onto Judas’ story by telling us: “Then Judas, who had betrayed Jesus, regretted what had happened when he saw that Jesus was condemned. He brought the 30 silver coins back to the chief priests and leaders. He said, ‘I’ve sinned by betraying an innocent man.’” (v. 3-4a)

On realizing that he had sinned, Judas tries to undo what had been done. However, the response he receives is amazing. The chief priests and leaders replied, “What do we care? That’s your problem.” (v. 4b)

In the end, Judas Iscariot realized what he did was wrong and he regretted what happened. In contrast, the chief priests and leaders – who were at least just as guilty as Judas was – are completely indifferent to the fact that they have sent an innocent man to die.

These people were supposed to be God’s representatives on earth, but while God’s character is one of love, nothing in the chief priests’ and leaders’ actions demonstrate a God that loves humanity. The chief priests and leaders statement of apathy towards Jesus’ condemnation reveals how far they had fallen away from knowing God.

In contrast, every action Jesus did throughout His ministry demonstrated God’s love. Even through the events surrounding the crucifixion, Jesus demonstrated God’s character more accurately than any of the religious leaders did.

Jesus chose to enter the world during a time when God’s character was the most misrepresented in all of history. He chose to enter the world at a time when He would ultimately be rejected and condemned without committing a crime. He chose to enter the world when the world needed to really see a clear picture of God in a time of apathy and indifference.

Jesus entered the world when He did for you and for me! His sacrifice opens the way for our salvation – even if the leaders that weekend were apathetic towards the life they had condemned to die.

This thought was inspired by studying the Walking With Jesus “Reflective Bible Study” package. To discover insights like this in your own study time, click here and give Reflective Bible Study a try today!

Subscribe to this blog and never miss an insight.

Two Opposite Brothers: Luke 15:11-32


Read the Transcript

In our last episode, we began looking at Jesus’ illustration that is normally referred to as the Parable of the Prodigal Son. However, with how Jesus begins the parable, we thought it would be better to emphasize the father in Jesus’ story because this is how Jesus opened up the parable, and because the Father likely represents God.

But our last episode didn’t have enough time to cover the last portion of this parable, so this episode will pick back up where we left off. However, in case you missed the last episode, let’s read the parable through from the start to catch you up, or at the very least, to refresh all of our memories with how this parable begins.

Our parable and passage are found in the gospel of Luke, chapter 15, and we will be reading out of the New International Version of the Bible. Starting in verse 11, Luke tells us that:

11 Jesus continued: “There was a man who had two sons. 12 The younger one said to his father, ‘Father, give me my share of the estate.’ So he divided his property between them.

13 “Not long after that, the younger son got together all he had, set off for a distant country and there squandered his wealth in wild living. 14 After he had spent everything, there was a severe famine in that whole country, and he began to be in need. 15 So he went and hired himself out to a citizen of that country, who sent him to his fields to feed pigs. 16 He longed to fill his stomach with the pods that the pigs were eating, but no one gave him anything.

17 “When he came to his senses, he said, ‘How many of my father’s hired servants have food to spare, and here I am starving to death! 18 I will set out and go back to my father and say to him: Father, I have sinned against heaven and against you. 19 I am no longer worthy to be called your son; make me like one of your hired servants.’ 20 So he got up and went to his father.

“But while he was still a long way off, his father saw him and was filled with compassion for him; he ran to his son, threw his arms around him and kissed him.

21 “The son said to him, ‘Father, I have sinned against heaven and against you. I am no longer worthy to be called your son.’

22 “But the father said to his servants, ‘Quick! Bring the best robe and put it on him. Put a ring on his finger and sandals on his feet. 23 Bring the fattened calf and kill it. Let’s have a feast and celebrate. 24 For this son of mine was dead and is alive again; he was lost and is found.’ So they began to celebrate.

This is where we finished off in our last episode. However, Jesus isn’t finished sharing the parable. Continuing in verse 25, we discover that:

25 “Meanwhile, the older son was in the field. When he came near the house, he heard music and dancing. 26 So he called one of the servants and asked him what was going on. 27 ‘Your brother has come,’ he replied, ‘and your father has killed the fattened calf because he has him back safe and sound.’

28 “The older brother became angry and refused to go in. So his father went out and pleaded with him. 29 But he answered his father, ‘Look! All these years I’ve been slaving for you and never disobeyed your orders. Yet you never gave me even a young goat so I could celebrate with my friends. 30 But when this son of yours who has squandered your property with prostitutes comes home, you kill the fattened calf for him!’

31 “‘My son,’ the father said, ‘you are always with me, and everything I have is yours. 32 But we had to celebrate and be glad, because this brother of yours was dead and is alive again; he was lost and is found.’”

What began as a celebration because of the younger son’s return home turns into a family dispute. It would seem that the father in this parable is only capable of pleasing one of his sons at a time. On the return of the younger son, the older son becomes resentful at the father’s joy.

Does this then mean that when God rejoices at the return and repentance of sinners, those who stayed beside Him without turning away will ultimately turn away and become resentful? From the way this parable describes this event, it certainly seems this way.

However, I believe this parable is a challenge and not a prediction. When we begin to see this parable as a challenge, then we stop letting it dictate our life and our future. Instead of seeing the two sons as two types of people we must choose between, we should think of these two sons as two extremes we probably should avoid.

The younger son represents the first extreme, and this extreme is rejecting God. It is never good to reject God, however this younger son does ultimately turn around and realize He needed to repent and return. The younger son’s return is the best decision that is made in this entire parable. The younger son falls, but he also models the best response when he comes to his senses and he chooses to repent and return to the Father, who as we mentioned in the previous episode represents God the Father.

The older son represents the other extreme, and this extreme is resenting God for His love and acceptance of sinners who repent. This extreme really is only a trap for people who have followed God their entire lives, and it is a trap because we begin to feel like we are missing out on something the world claimed to offer and that God is not happy that we stayed with Him. Neither portion of this trap is true. The younger son experienced temporary happiness that was shallow and self-serving, and then ultimately the younger son experienced rejection and ultimate humiliation. If these things are desirable to someone who has followed God their whole life, then perhaps rejecting God is a great choice.

However, before rejecting God, ask someone who has left God who then came to their senses and returned. Ask this person if their time away from God was valuable and/or worthwhile. Don’t ask someone living apart from God this question, because they won’t give you as honest of an answer simply because they either haven’t come to their senses, or because they truly don’t know both sides of this decision.

The truth of the older son’s extreme is that God is incredibly happy that we have stayed with Him and everything He has is ours. By staying with God, we have avoided many other traps we could face, and the only reason to be resentful is because we think we missed out on something important, or we don’t understand God’s love and His character of forgiveness. If we have been living our lives looking forward to seeing other people get judged for their actions, then we are living in the older son’s extreme and trap.

We don’t have to reject God and we don’t have to chose to be resentful when sinners repent and return to God. However, these two brothers represent the extremes we all face when deciding to come to God and when we discover just how loving, forgiving, and accepting God truly is!

As we come to the end of another podcast episode, here are the challenges I will leave you with:

Whether you identify more with the older son or the younger son, choose to avoid each son’s extremes. Choose instead to return to God humbly when you’ve fallen away, and choose to love those who return like God loves and celebrates for those who repent and return. Understand that these two extremes, and the traps that these extremes represent, are the extremes God wants us to avoid in our lives.

Also, continue to pray and study the Bible for yourself. Don’t take my word, or anyone else’s word for it. Choose to study the Bible for yourself and don’t let me or anyone else get between you and your relationship with God.

And as I end every set of challenges by saying in one way or another, never stop short of, back away from, or abandon where God wants to lead you to in your life with Him!

Year of Parables – Episode 32: In the Parable of the Prodigal Son, discover how each brother represents an extreme we can take, and how neither extreme leads anywhere positive. Discover the best path for moving forward when returning to God and when celebrating the return of others.

Join the discussion. Share your thoughts on this passage.

Limiting Miracles: Mark 8:22-26

Focus Passage: Mark 8:22-26 (GNT)

22 They came to Bethsaida, where some people brought a blind man to Jesus and begged him to touch him. 23 Jesus took the blind man by the hand and led him out of the village. After spitting on the man’s eyes, Jesus placed his hands on him and asked him,
         Can you see anything?

24 The man looked up and said,
         Yes, I can see people, but they look like trees walking around.

25 Jesus again placed his hands on the man’s eyes. This time the man looked intently, his eyesight returned, and he saw everything clearly. 26 Jesus then sent him home with the order,
         Don’t go back into the village.

Read Mark 8:22-26 in context and/or in other translations on BibleGateway.com!

The big idea I see in this passage, and in this unique healing miracle is this: My lack of faith may limit Jesus’ ability to work miracles in my life.

We can see this idea played out in a few details within Mark’s retelling of this event.

First, other people bring the blind man to Jesus. We can assume they are more interested in seeing a miracle than on seeing this disabled man be healed. We see this idea played out (and perhaps a collective groan/sigh) when Jesus takes the blind man out of the village and away from them.

Next, since other people brought the blind man to Jesus, we may conclude that the man wasn’t all that confident in Jesus’ ability to heal him. Other blind people made a much bigger deal when getting near Jesus than this man did. This man likely had lots of doubts about Jesus.

Thirdly, this is one of the only times where Jesus performs a healing that doesn’t “work” entirely the first time around. He has to try again. The big takeaway I have from this two-times approach is that the man needed a little evidence in Jesus’ ability to assure him that Jesus really could heal him. We might call him the “Thomas” (John 20:24-29) of those who Jesus healed.

The now formerly blind man has faith and evidence to believe in Jesus, and it was the partial evidence that he allowed to strengthen his faith that gave him the ability to experience the complete healing miracle.

This thought was inspired by studying the Walking With Jesus “Reflective Bible Study” package. To discover insights like this in your own study time, click here and give Reflective Bible Study a try today!

Subscribe to this blog and never miss an insight.