Reflective Bible Study

Continuing where we left off last week looking at one of Jesus’ parables that He shared leading up to the night He was betrayed and arrested, let’s turn our attention onto what Jesus taught immediately following the conclusion of this parable. However, since this is our year focusing on prophecy and connection points between Jesus’ ministry and the Old Testament, let’s first begin by looking at the psalm Jesus quotes from while wrapping up the parable He challenged the religious leaders with.

This psalm is number 118, and let’s read it using the New American Standard Bible. Starting in verse 15, the psalmist writes:

¹⁵ The sound of joyful shouting and salvation is in the tents of the righteous;
The right hand of the Lord does valiantly.
¹⁶ The right hand of the Lord is exalted;
The right hand of the Lord does valiantly.
¹⁷ I will not die, but live,
And tell of the works of the Lord.
¹⁸ The Lord has disciplined me severely,
But He has not given me over to death.

¹⁹ Open to me the gates of righteousness;
I shall enter through them, I shall give thanks to the Lord.
²⁰ This is the gate of the Lord;
The righteous will enter through it.
²¹ I shall give thanks to You, for You have answered me,
And You have become my salvation.

²² The stone which the builders rejected
Has become the chief corner stone.
²³ This is the Lord’s doing;
It is marvelous in our eyes.

Let’s jump out of reading this psalm here. Overall, this psalm gives praise to God for all the blessings He has given to His people. However, tucked within this psalm of praise is a message about some builders rejecting a cornerstone. While this might be a reference to something that took place in the Old Testament, a quick search while I was preparing for this episode did not turn up a specific event in Israel’s history that I could refer to.

While there may be a time I wasn’t able to find, what I find even more fascinating than the specific details surrounding this psalm and why this idea was written into this psalm, is how Jesus ultimately frames this idea when He draws attention to it in the New Testament. While this phrase is shared in several of the gospels, let’s read it from Matthew’s gospel. Let’s also step back and read the parable we began with to give this teaching the context that those listening to Jesus would have had.

So with this said, let’s read from Matthew’s gospel, chapter 21, and starting at the beginning of the parable in verse 33, Jesus says:

³³ “Listen to another parable. There was a landowner who planted a vineyard and put a wall around it and dug a wine press in it, and built a tower, and rented it out to vine-growers and went on a journey. ³⁴ When the harvest time approached, he sent his slaves to the vine-growers to receive his produce. ³⁵ The vine-growers took his slaves and beat one, and killed another, and stoned a third. ³⁶ Again he sent another group of slaves larger than the first; and they did the same thing to them. ³⁷ But afterward he sent his son to them, saying, ‘They will respect my son.’ ³⁸ But when the vine-growers saw the son, they said among themselves, ‘This is the heir; come, let us kill him and seize his inheritance.’ ³⁹ They took him, and threw him out of the vineyard and killed him. ⁴⁰ Therefore when the owner of the vineyard comes, what will he do to those vine-growers?” ⁴¹ They said to Him, “He will bring those wretches to a wretched end, and will rent out the vineyard to other vine-growers who will pay him the proceeds at the proper seasons.”

⁴² Jesus said to them, “Did you never read in the Scriptures,

‘The stone which the builders rejected,
This became the chief corner stone;
This came about from the Lord,
And it is marvelous in our eyes’?

⁴³ Therefore I say to you, the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people, producing the fruit of it. ⁴⁴ And he who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces; but on whomever it falls, it will scatter him like dust.”

⁴⁵ When the chief priests and the Pharisees heard His parables, they understood that He was speaking about them. ⁴⁶ When they sought to seize Him, they feared the people, because they considered Him to be a prophet.

As this event concludes, I find it fascinating that there are two ways Jesus frames understanding this psalm.

The first way of understanding it may have been the traditional way that those in the first century had understood this idea. This framing said that the Jewish nation, which was rejected by most every society at most points in history, ultimately will be made into the cornerstone of God’s kingdom.

On one hand, I believe this to be a true statement, with the only clarification or modification to what I shared earlier being that this cornerstone would be known as spiritual Israel, rather than the literal Jewish nation. While framing this idea as spiritual Israel allows for God-fearing Jews to be included, it also allows all of God’s people who started their life’s journey apart from God who come to God later in their lives. These people are welcomed in, and grafted into God’s family too.

However, I suspect that while these first century religious leaders may have believed this first angle for understanding this psalm, they rightly concluded that Jesus’ use of this psalm did not align with their frame.

Instead, Jesus takes the concept in this psalm, and subtly applies it to Himself. While it is very tempting to jump to the end of this conclusion and claim that Jesus is referring to Himself as the cornerstone, moving too quickly to this endpoint misses several powerful additional ideas Jesus shares in His conclusion.

Immediately following the conclusion of His parable and quoting this psalm, Jesus challenges the religious leaders by saying: “Therefore I say to you, the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people, producing the fruit of it.” (v. 43)

With this verse as the immediate context for Jesus’ challenge, the best, first frame for understanding Jesus’ quotation is that what God is building is the kingdom of God. With the context being on Jesus warning these religious leaders that their lack of returning to God the fruit He desired was going to cost them their place in the kingdom of God, it was no surprise to anyone present that these religious leaders were opposed to Jesus.

However, with the context of this quote being framed as God building His kingdom, where would be the best place to look for a cornerstone. Some people, including many of the Jewish leaders living in the first century, believe the cornerstone of God’s kingdom would be the scriptures. I can understand the logic involved with this conclusion. The scriptures are a gift from God and a great foundation for growing our spiritual lives. Also, God’s Word, and His law form one big foundational element in His kingdom.

But elsewhere in the gospels, specifically in John’s gospel, we read Jesus challenging some religious leaders with the truth that the scriptures actually point to Someone. According to Jesus’ framing of the scriptures, when we are actively using them to base our life on, we will be logically pointed towards the One they were written to point us towards. According to Jesus, scriptures themselves don’t contain eternal life; they simply point to the One who has the power to give eternal life. This conversation is found in John, chapter 5, verses 39 and 40.

With all this in mind, we can then conclude that according to Jesus, God’s kingdom is built on the truth of the One scripture points us to, and the One scripture points us to is God the Messiah, who many people believe to be Jesus Christ Himself.

It is amazing in my mind that Jesus’ parable concludes with the tenants killing the vineyard owner’s son, and the psalm Jesus quotes also talks about the builders rejecting the cornerstone. The first century Jewish leaders were the ones entrusted with building up God’s kingdom, but they ultimately miss, discount, and reject the Cornerstone that God provided to Humanity.

However, we can be thankful for this because through Jesus’ death, the way has been made for our salvation. Jesus finishes this teaching in verse 44 by saying that: “he who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces; but on whomever it falls, it will scatter him like dust.”

While we don’t have time to unpack this portion of the verse as well as I would like, it is worth noting that every member of humanity must come to grips with Jesus. If we choose to fall to our knees before Jesus, we will be broken and ultimately rebuilt into being the people God created us to be. However, if we choose to hold back on being broken by Jesus, this Cornerstone will figuratively crush us and scatter us like dust.

Jesus is the cornerstone of God’s kingdom. With this as one of the biggest themes in the Bible, it is up to us how we respond to Jesus. Jesus challenges us to come humbly to Him, bringing with us the fruit God wants us to have, and letting Him transform us into being the people He created us to be.

As we come to the end of another podcast episode, here are the challenges I will leave you with:

As I always open by challenging you, intentionally seek God first in your life and choose to let Jesus transform you through His love. Choose to place your faith, hope, trust, and belief in Jesus, the Cornerstone of God’s kingdom, and His sacrifice on the cross.

Also, continue to pray and study the Bible for yourself to learn and grow closer to Jesus each and every day. Through regular prayer and Bible study, discover how much Jesus loves us and what He was willing to go through because He wants each of us with Him in the New Heaven and New Earth.

And as I end every set of challenges by saying in one way or another, never stop short of, back away from, chicken out of, or abandon where God wants to lead you to in your life with Him!

Every so often, while moving through the gospels, we come across a passage that has the power to radically change someone’s perspective. The passage we are looking at for this podcast episode is one such passage for me.

A number of years ago, while studying this passage using Reflective Bible Study, I noticed a phrase in Luke’s version of this event that is not in Matthew or in Mark, and this phrase radically shifted my view about God, about death, about the future resurrection, and about the idea of perspective within the Bible. In other words, this passage pushed me to pay closer attention to the perspective of who is sharing the message within each Bible passage, and in Jesus’ case, we must pay attention to whether He is sharing from humanity’s perspective or from God’s perspective. While Jesus can share from either, it seems that Jesus usually draws us to pay attention to God’s perspective.

The extra phrase that is found within Luke’s gospel also may have stood out to me when I read it simply because I have never heard anyone else mention it, or draw attention onto it prior to my studying it. It is almost as if this is a forgotten or intentionally ignored phrase in a passage that doesn’t get much attention, simply because it challenges most people’s views about death and the resurrection. In short, this passage challenges all three major views regarding the state of those who have died without really touching directly on this topic.

Let’s read what happened and then unpack what we can learn from what Jesus taught. Our passage is found in Luke’s gospel, chapter 20, and we will read it from the New International Version of the Bible. Starting in verse 27, Luke tells us that:

²⁷ Some of the Sadducees, who say there is no resurrection, came to Jesus with a question. ²⁸ “Teacher,” they said, “Moses wrote for us that if a man’s brother dies and leaves a wife but no children, the man must marry the widow and raise up offspring for his brother. ²⁹ Now there were seven brothers. The first one married a woman and died childless. ³⁰ The second ³¹ and then the third married her, and in the same way the seven died, leaving no children. ³² Finally, the woman died too. ³³ Now then, at the resurrection whose wife will she be, since the seven were married to her?”

Pausing briefly, I am always a little humored at both the framing of the Sadducees dilemma, and at the ultimate question they ask. Luke has opened by saying that the Sadducees do not believe in a resurrection, but then they ask Jesus about what happens in the scenario they share at the resurrection.

I suspect that the Sadducees, who only regarded the Old Testament books Moses wrote as spiritually authoritative, had used this marriage dilemma as their reasoning for rejecting the resurrection. Because of this marriage instruction, it created a problem for when multiple brothers returned to life.

Because Moses clearly gave this instruction while not clearly drawing attention to the concept of a resurrection, in the Sadducees eyes, this dilemma logically concluded that resurrection was not valid because marriage is. In the Sadducees eyes, this dilemma made marriage, and all the legalities surrounding it, incompatible with the resurrection.

However, let’s read Jesus’ reply and uncover what we can learn about both these significant topics. Continuing in verse 34:

³⁴ Jesus replied, “The people of this age marry and are given in marriage. ³⁵ But those who are considered worthy of taking part in the age to come and in the resurrection from the dead will neither marry nor be given in marriage, ³⁶ and they can no longer die; for they are like the angels. They are God’s children, since they are children of the resurrection. ³⁷ But in the account of the burning bush, even Moses showed that the dead rise, for he calls the Lord ‘the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.’ ³⁸ He is not the God of the dead, but of the living, for to him all are alive.”

³⁹ Some of the teachers of the law responded, “Well said, teacher!” ⁴⁰ And no one dared to ask him any more questions.

I am continually amazed at Jesus’ response, because His response challenges everyone present, while also subtly affirming a difficult to accept belief.

As Jesus opens His reply, He both challenges the belief that the resurrection is a fantasy while also subtly validating the detail that marriage and resurrection are, in the framing of the Sadducees dilemma, incompatible. However, Jesus stresses the detail that the resurrection that He promises marks the end of marriage, and this also draws us to understand exactly where we are in history. Since marriage is still something that occurs today, regardless of what you believe about marriage, its existence places us clearly before the resurrection and before the age to come.

In Jesus’ eyes, resurrection is a clear promise and something we can look forward to experiencing!

Next, Jesus challenges the belief that death is simply a transition into heaven. This is because the Sadducees question and dilemma is framed at the resurrection, and Jesus’ reply is also framed as being at the resurrection. Before the resurrection, the Sadducees dilemma makes perfect sense because before the resurrection contains marriage. If those who have died are conscious and living in heaven awaiting resurrection, the scenario that the Sadducees give is a valid concern, because all seven brothers were married to this woman.

Jesus’ reply frames this dilemma as not a dilemma because everything in His reply happens on or after the resurrection transition. The state of those who are dead prior to the resurrection is equal to nothing, or at the very least, it lacks consciousness and interaction with others. (Remember that if those who have died are able to see each other, then the Sadducees dilemma is a valid logical argument.)

In Jesus’ eyes, the Sadducees dilemma is not valid because there is no consciousness between death and the resurrection.

The third major belief that Jesus challenges in this passage is that death is a sleep waiting for resurrection. While in many other places death is referred to as a sleep, Jesus’ final statement in this passage appears to take aim at this belief as well. Jesus’ final words in this response are “He [referring to the Lord, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob] is not the God of the dead, but of the living, for to him all are alive.”

This third challenge is valid because if God sees all people as alive, even after their bodies have long decomposed, then they must exist somewhere. It is less relevant the state of their existence as the fact that they exist separately from the breath and the dust that is not given any specific or special designation.

In Jesus’ eyes, everyone, regardless of whether they are alive or dead, is alive in God’s eyes.

All three major views of death are challenged in this short passage. I suspect this is why almost no one talks about this event. To bring up the Sadducees dilemma means putting a target on yourself and on your belief about death and the resurrection.

However, how can we reconcile this?

Is there a view of death that is compatible with all three challenges?

I believe the answer is a clear yes, even if this view will likely never be popular. The answer to this viewpoint is seeing history as a timeline. The answer is seeing history as His story – specifically as God’s story.

To reconcile this in my own mind, I needed to start somewhere. Since the most common metaphor for death in the Bible is sleep, I started there. Death is described as sleep more than any other way in the Bible that I am aware of. However, the typical understanding of death as a sleep leaves out one major idea. Death as a sleep leaves out history’s timeline.

God has a clear record of history because history is His story. Because God exists outside of time, all He must do to see people as alive is to go to the part of His story that they are in. This does not mean that people now dead or who are not yet born are currently alive from our perspective. Instead, this means that God merely moves to a different part in history to see them as alive.

Does this mean that we no longer have any freedom of choice? Some people believe this, however I do not. Only if I knew God’s perspective and could see my future would I surrender all choice. God knowing what I will choose does not mean I don’t freely choose it. Since I don’t know my future, I have the freedom of pressing forward with the freedom of choice.

What does this mean then for the resurrection? With the timeline perspective of history, the resurrection is simple. God has planned a sequel to the story that sin corrupted, and this sequel is the New Heaven and New Earth. The resurrection then becomes the transition moment when God closes this book of history, and pulls all His people from our current story into His sequel. Because God is outside of time writing history, He has the power to pull characters from any point in His story into His sequel and He chooses to do that for His people!

Jesus teaches all of us that the resurrection is defined at the transition between the current age and the age to come. The age to come is marked by the absence of marriage. This means that the age we are currently living in as the same age as Jesus spoke, since marriage is an issue and a topic of discussion today.

However,this age filled with sin isn’t all we have to look forward to. God is planning a sequel, and He wants you and me to be a part of it!

As we come to the end of a longer podcast than what I was planning, here are the challenges I will leave you with:

As always, intentionally seek God first in your life. Choose to ally yourself with Jesus and accept Jesus’ gift that He offers, which is a place within His sequel.

Also, continue to pray and study the Bible for yourself. On any subject or idea you hear, see, or read, take the idea and filter it through God’s Word. Don’t take my word, or any pastor, speaker, author, or podcaster at face value. Study out your beliefs and let God push you into discovering His truth. If you haven’t studied the different angles of beliefs about death, perhaps this episode is an invitation or challenge to do so. Like me, you may be surprised about what you can discover.

And as I end every set of challenges by saying in one way or another, never stop short of, back away from, chicken out of, or stray away from where God wants to lead you to in your life with Him!