Flashback Episode — Facing False Accusations: Matthew 26:57-68

After Jesus was betrayed and arrested during the night before His crucifixion, one of the first stops the mob takes Jesus is to a trial. However, far from being a fair trial, this mob takes Jesus to a trial where every piece of this trial was tilted against His favor. While most people would hope for a fair trial if they faced something similar, the trial Jesus faced, as we will soon discover, was filled with a countless number of liars who all wanted to see Jesus executed.

However, even more amazing than this clearly biased trial against Jesus, was that when the trial was falling apart, help came from an unexpected source to keep the trial moving forward. Let’s read about what happened.

Our passage for this episode is found in the gospel of Matthew, chapter 26, and we will read it using the New Century Version. Starting in verse 59, Matthew tells us that:

⁵⁹ The leading priests and the whole Jewish council tried to find something false against Jesus so they could kill him. ⁶⁰ Many people came and told lies about him, but the council could find no real reason to kill him. Then two people came and said, ⁶¹ “This man said, ‘I can destroy the Temple of God and build it again in three days.’”

⁶² Then the high priest stood up and said to Jesus, “Aren’t you going to answer? Don’t you have something to say about their charges against you?” ⁶³ But Jesus said nothing.

Again the high priest said to Jesus, “I command you by the power of the living God: Tell us if you are the Christ, the Son of God.”

⁶⁴ Jesus answered, “Those are your words. But I tell you, in the future you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of God, the Powerful One, and coming on clouds in the sky.”

⁶⁵ When the high priest heard this, he tore his clothes and said, “This man has said things that are against God! We don’t need any more witnesses; you all heard him say these things against God. ⁶⁶ What do you think?”

The people answered, “He should die.”

While reading this passage, several things jumped off the page at me.

First off, when reading this event, I am always amazed that when faced with false accusation after false accusation, and lie after lie, Jesus choose to say nothing. Jesus stayed silent rather than defend Himself. This response is amazing in my mind, because the more logical and rational response would be to counter the lie with some form of the truth. I know that at least in my own life, it is very difficult to remain silent when lies are being thrown my way.

However, Jesus models what can happen when we stay silent. In Jesus’ case, the more lies that are thrown His way, the less credible the liars become. While we might think that the lies spoken about Jesus would reflect negatively upon Him, the opposite happened. All the lies the religious leaders tried to use to condemn Jesus almost cost them the validity of their trial, if their trial actually had any validity in the first place.

Again, I am amazed by Jesus choosing to stay silent, because I suspect if I were present and in a similar situation, staying silent would be among the hardest things for me to do.

Next in this passage, I want to point out that present in the brief conversation Jesus has with Caiaphas, there is a subtle shift in the language present. Firstly, Caiaphas demands Jesus to answer whether He is God’s Son, and Jesus responds by naming Himself as a Son of Man, though in this particular context, the Son of Man Jesus was referring to was a Son of Man who would be glorified by God.

Caiaphas then takes Jesus’ words and frames them as a statement against God. While a casual reader or observer would be unlikely to see the connection between Jesus’ words and a statement against God, nothing stops Caiaphas from framing Jesus’ words this way, before demanding that His supporters accept and agree with this position.

As I read Jesus’ response, I don’t see anything that is against God. If God wanted to, He could place any mortal person or immortal being at His right hand for a specific event, or for a specific reason. It would be ridiculous for us to vilify God for honoring someone who is clearly supporting and drawing people to praise God.

However, perhaps the issue these religious leaders have with Jesus is that Jesus used the phrase Son of Man and placed it in the most important position in God’s kingdom – which in Jesus’ own statement is at the right hand of the God. In God’s kingdom, man is lower than God, and because of this reason, man does not deserve to be given that significant, prestigious place of honor.

Also possible, I wonder if Caiaphas’ issue is that the man Jesus would claim to prophesy about what would happen in the future regarding God. While Jesus didn’t preface His words with any of the typical prophetic introductions, Caiaphas concludes that Jesus could only be speaking from a place of humanity.

I’ll be the first to state that I don’t know what Caiaphas was thinking, or what grounds He wanted to use to build the case against Jesus. What I do know from reading this is that the false witnesses and liars were doing more harm to the trial against Jesus than helping it, and Caiaphas needed something to validate the case against Jesus.

When all hope appeared to be lost, Caiaphas presses Jesus to speak, and Jesus gives Caiaphas something that could be twisted into a claim against God, even if what Jesus said was nothing remotely like that.

Oddly enough, this trial against Jesus validates the words written in Psalm 35:19, which Jesus quotes in John 15:35 that says “They hated me for no reason.” While these religious leaders hated Jesus, there was nothing spiritual or significant in their hatred of Jesus. Instead, they simply disliked Jesus because He wasn’t one of them, and because He was clearly supported by God outside of their chain of spiritual command.

The last thing we have time to talk about in this podcast episode that stood out to me is that the people responded to Caiaphas’ challenge with the death sentence. Because this was a significant weekend that would have brought the religious leaders together from all over the region, I suspect that there would be no shortage of people the religious leaders could have hand-picked from to side with them calling for Jesus’ death. Even though there were several synagogue leaders who Jesus had helped, I suspect that these religious leaders who lived in Jerusalem focused their attention on collecting those they knew would support them in being hostile towards Jesus.

And while it might surprise you to hear me say this, we should thank them. All the hostility thrust towards Jesus on that weekend paved the way for God’s greatest demonstration of love. Even though this whole trial was a setup, and this trial was far from even appearing fair, Jesus still went through with it, and accepted the false accusations thrust upon Him because His goal was paying for your sins and mine. Jesus faced the cross for you and me, and this only happened because the religious leaders in the first century stacked a case against Jesus, calling for His death.

As we come to the end of another podcast episode, here are the challenges I will leave you with:

As I always challenge you to do, intentionally seek God first in your life. Understand and believe that Jesus came to demonstrate the God the Father’s love for each of us – and He was willing to go through anything to help us see and understand this truth.

Also, as I always challenge you to do, continue praying and studying the Bible for yourself in order to fully grasp what happened in Jesus’ life and death, and to really know what God’s love looks like. Don’t take my word or anyone else’s word for this. Personally read and study the Bible for yourself to grow personally closer to God each and every day.

And as I end every set of challenges by saying in one way or another, never stop short of, back away from, chicken out of, or deviate away from where God wants to lead you to in your life with Him!