Reflective Bible Study

Tucked away in this healing is a glimpse of what God is like. From all of Jesus’ healing, we can see a picture of God as loving, kind, serving, and helping those in need, but in this passage and in this healing, we get another piece of God’s character showed to us. This truth comes both from what is said in the gospel record and from what is not.

The event begins with ten lepers calling out to Jesus for healing. Jesus tells all ten to go show themselves to the priests, and they all begin running to see the priest. As they were going, they realized that they had been healed, and one turns back to thank Jesus personally. Jesus then makes the comment about how only one returned to give thanks and glory to God, “But the nine—where are they? Was no one found who returned to give glory to God, except this foreigner?” (Verse 17b-18)

Hidden in this healing is another picture of God. With these ten lepers, God was willing to heal them simply because they asked, regardless of whether they came back to thank Jesus. We can easily see this because 90% of them did not return, but the fact that they went and that they realized they were healed, and they would then be declared clean by the priest who would confirm the healing.

Jesus commends the former leper who returned to give thanks, but nowhere do we see that the healing was dependent on returning to give thanks. All ten former lepers had faith because they all chose to obey Jesus and go to the priest.

This brings me to the big thought for this post: God appreciates our thanks when He does things for us. He reaches out and heals us even when we don’t give thanks or recognize that it is Him working.

If you haven’t remembered to thank God today for something He has done (or is currently doing), now is a great moment to say “thank you” to Him.

During the night Jesus was betrayed and arrested, the gospel of John records the final time Jesus was able to freely share with the disciples prior to facing the events that would lead up to His death. In this conversation, Jesus makes a profound claim that everyone who calls himself or herself a Christian will have to resolve in his/her mind.

Early on in this conversation, Jesus tells the small group of disciples: “What I say isn’t said on my own. The Father who lives in me does these things.” (v. 10b)

This statement is powerful because Jesus is basically saying that everything He does, and every part of Himself is because of God the Father living inside of Him. If what Jesus is telling the disciples is true in this statement (which I believe is true), then this means that everyone who rejects, minimizes, discounts, ignores, or opposes Jesus is really opposing God the Father – even if they think they simply are rejecting a mere carpenter who lived long ago.

The reason this is so significant in my mind is that with this claim, Jesus basically removes Himself out of the equation and leaves people left with a picture of the God the Father. With this statement, either Jesus steps into being a lunatic, or He has shared an incredibly powerful truth that should frame every Christian’s frame of reference.

But which direction should we take this statement? Is Jesus God’s Ambassador or simply a lunatic who has just shown his true colors?

When we look at Jesus’ life, both before and after this statement, we can better understand which way we should lean when answering this question.

Looking at Jesus’ ministry and life prior to this statement, we see plenty of miracles and events that could only happen if God was with Jesus. God would not support a lunatic as strongly as He supported Jesus’ ministry.

Also, prior to this statement, Jesus had repeatedly warned the disciples about His upcoming death and resurrection. When both these events happened exactly how Jesus described they would, we can conclude that God would not have supported predictions and claims like this from a lunatic.

Following this statement, we see Jesus dying without giving any indication He was withdrawing or backtracking on this claim. A lunatic would most likely say almost anything to avoid death, but it appears that Jesus welcomed it.

And the greatest validation for this claim Jesus made is that He rose from the dead. Only a tiny number of people in history have truly died, been buried, and then rose back to life. God would not have raised a lunatic from the dead to validate a prophecy the lunatic had made.

These details together point us to the challenging fact that Jesus must be telling the truth when He tells us that the Father lives inside Him and was responsible for the Person He was.

Jesus came to reveal the Father to the world, and if we ever have a question about what the Father is like, all we need to do is look at how Jesus lived to find our answer. The Father lived inside of Jesus and the Father was responsible for Jesus’ healing, preaching, teaching, and every other portion of His ministry. God offers us a new life with Him through Jesus, and we would be wise to take Him up on His offer!

Throughout Jesus’ ministry, three of the four gospel’s writers record at least one time where the disciples began an argument about who would be the greatest among them. During one of these arguments, Luke’s gospel shares an interesting phrase that is incredibly profound when we stop to think about it.

Luke describes this event by saying: “An argument started among the disciples as to which of them would be the greatest. Jesus, knowing their thoughts, took a little child and had him stand beside him.” (v. 46-47)

While I don’t know how Luke knew to include a phrase that he included, but he tells all of us that Jesus framed His response to the disciples because He knew their thoughts. This is significant in my mind because not only could Jesus specifically see into the minds of those closest to Him, He also chose to interact with those who He knew their deepest, darkest secrets. Nothing about the disciples’ lives was hidden from Jesus.

I’m not sure if Luke includes this detail because this was a onetime occurrence in Jesus’ ministry, or if this was Luke’s subtle way of suggesting that Jesus continually had this divine revelation into people’s minds, but when we look at other events in the gospels, I don’t think Jesus was ever truly surprised by something that happened. Even Judas Iscariot’s betrayal was not a surprise to Jesus.

Jesus knew the disciples better than they knew themselves, and Jesus chose to interact and associate with them. In a similar way, Jesus knows us better than we know ourselves – and He chooses to love us, forgive us, and give us the gift of salvation. Jesus knows our deepest, darkest secrets and He still chooses to love us. Nothing in our past or future is a surprise to Him, and because He still chooses to love us when He knows our worst, we can trust that He has the best future imaginable waiting for us when we accept Him into our hearts.

Some of Jesus’ teaching is compassionate and uplifting; some of His teaching is challenging; and there are a few places were Jesus’ teaching seem to rub up against culture and our experience in ways that make us uncomfortable.

It is in this last category that our passage in today’s journal entry falls, but while divorce is a real challenge in today’s culture, and it has affected almost every person alive today in one way or another, too often we take Jesus’ words here as a condemnation of those who have been divorced – which actually is taking the verses out of context.

This conversation would not have happened except for one thing that happened: the Pharisees open up the discussion. Verse 3 begins by saying, “Some Pharisees came to Jesus and tried to trick him.”

In order to best understand the context of this teaching, we must first understand that Jesus probably would not have brought up the subject had He not been challenged with it. Other people came to Him with the question about the idea, so Jesus will answer with God’s ideal scenario. Verse 4 points to the original plan at creation, verse 5 recalls God’s words about how marriage would proceed, and verse 6 concludes with the challenge that we should not undo what God has done. This is the ideal scenario. We could call it Plan A.

But then, thinking they have Jesus firmly in the trap, the Pharisees respond with their follow-up question in verse 7: “Why then did Moses give a command for a man to divorce his wife by giving her divorce papers?”

The Pharisees have successfully contrasted Jesus’ teaching with Moses’ teaching, but instead of placing Moses’ revelation as being the one closest to God, Jesus draws out the contrast between God’s ideal and Moses’ exception. The original question in verse 3 included the phrase “for any reason he chooses”, and this is more what Jesus pushes back on.

Jesus gives one acceptable reason, but if we look closer at His one valid reason, we see something interesting. Verse 9, the one that makes people feel uncomfortable, says basically that adultery will be present at the end of a marriage. Either it will cause the marriage to end, or the marriage ending will result in it.

Jesus’ statement on divorce is not a condemnation; it is a challenging truth. Jesus says it to push His audience towards the conclusion He wants them to reach. Verse 10 shares this conclusion, “If that is the only reason a man can divorce his wife, it is better not to marry.”

Jesus wants His audience to be more intentional about following God’s ideal. Jesus follows up in verse 11 and 12 by saying it is perfectly okay for someone to choose to remain single. Reaching the place where a single person is okay with not marrying is the first step to becoming ready for marriage.

My own life experience has taught me that sometimes it is better to reach the place where I am satisfied being single before God will bring that special someone into my life. (Incidentally, this is exactly what happened to me in 2007 right before meeting Suzie, my wife-to-be.)